However, without even getting deep into the nuts and bolts of that proof, the physicalist position was always either (1) that physicality explains itself, which is impossible, because it is defined on determinism, which always requires prior cause and is therefore invalid because without any initiation, there is no initiation, or (2) that the universe has no ultimate explanation, which is to say it is of “indeterminate determinacy” which is also contradictory and thus invalid. Therefore, proof by contradiction implies some sort of metaphysicality a priori.
Lucky for you, we live in a time where that metaphysicality has been rigorously addressed. Unluckily for you, your haughtiness may block you from it forever.
An adult who believes physicality is self-explanatory should be shameful. Self-explanation requires explanatory recursion of the sort that only consciousness possesses. This is all laid out very clearly in the CTMU. I know abstraction is difficult, but that's why stone-throwing is very ill-advised for a fake "sentinel" such as yourself. Here's hoping you learn to step on fewer rakes in the future.
Oh darling, that's so cute. You can't even handle burden of proof. If you need help to step the curb, I'll do my best.
You're coming across as highly ignorant and angry.
The burden of proof has been met via the CTMU.
However, without even getting deep into the nuts and bolts of that proof, the physicalist position was always either (1) that physicality explains itself, which is impossible, because it is defined on determinism, which always requires prior cause and is therefore invalid because without any initiation, there is no initiation, or (2) that the universe has no ultimate explanation, which is to say it is of “indeterminate determinacy” which is also contradictory and thus invalid. Therefore, proof by contradiction implies some sort of metaphysicality a priori.
Lucky for you, we live in a time where that metaphysicality has been rigorously addressed. Unluckily for you, your haughtiness may block you from it forever.
Adorable. God of the gaps rebranded. Who wins the soggy biscuit evenings in this circle?
No Idea who O'Connor is. Either way, he doesn't speak for me.
An adult with imaginary friends should be shameful. You're LARPing D&D
An adult who believes physicality is self-explanatory should be shameful. Self-explanation requires explanatory recursion of the sort that only consciousness possesses. This is all laid out very clearly in the CTMU. I know abstraction is difficult, but that's why stone-throwing is very ill-advised for a fake "sentinel" such as yourself. Here's hoping you learn to step on fewer rakes in the future.